On privacy choices
Mike posted this as a comment on my previous blog post:
You’re posting on a PUBLIC blog on a very PUBLIC internet about the people places and events that are PUBLIC to you and you’re surprised that someone posted information PUBLICLY about YOU?
OK, bit by bit:
You’re posting on a PUBLIC blog on a very PUBLIC internet about the people places and events that are PUBLIC to you
I have mentioned people like Sheila Malcolmson, who is obviously a very public person. She puts her name and her photo on her website, submits things to newspapers, and so forth. People who hold public office usually do want to be known by the public. I’ve mentioned musicians like The Kerplunks and Victor Anthony, who have websites featuring information about their lives and photos of themselves. The Gabriola people I’ve mentioned by name have chosen to be public people, or have agreed that I can mention them here. I can’t think of a single exception.
If I want to mention somebody on my blog and that person isn’t clearly a public person (or perhaps is one of the public people I’ve mentioned above, but engaged in a private activity) I ask first. Hey, do you mind if I mention this on my blog?
and so forth. I respect individual preferences about what people want to share on the internet and what they want to keep private. I ask every time. When I wanted to blog about Iain Lawrence’s dog, Misty, I wrote to Iain first to ask if that would be ok.
When I wrote this Gabriola traffic blog entry, I left the driver’s name out of it, even though I know perfectly well who he is.
and you’re surprised that someone posted information PUBLICLY about YOU?
I haven’t posted my name, initials, usernames, email addresses, or phone number on this blog, or anywhere else. Why would anybody take it upon himself to hunt down my name (not posted here or anywhere) and then out
me by posting personal details about me? To me this makes no sense whatsoever.
I try pretty hard to respect other people’s privacy choices. Is it too much to ask that people respect my privacy choices, which should be obvious by what I’ve kept off the web?
(Update: I’ve added a privacy page and put a link to it on the navigation bar.)
Filed in Gabriola people 5 Comments so far
5 Responses to “On privacy choices”

Mike on 28 Feb 2010 at 6:52 am #
“I haven’t posted my name, initials, usernames, email addresses, or phone number on this blog, or anywhere else. Why would anybody take it upon himself to hunt down my name (not posted here or anywhere)”
Any chance you could give me the name of the person who tracked you down without ANY information being public? I would love to see if he/she could find me the winning 649 numbers for next weeks draw ….. chuckle
By the way I still enjoy your blog and hope you continue …..
it's a shame on 28 Feb 2010 at 9:18 am #
If ‘Mike’ had posted his/her full name then his/her post would have had some credibility. As ‘Mike’ obviously wishes to remain anonymous on a ‘PUBLIC’ blog, which is his/her choice, it’s ‘Mike’ who should give his/her head a shake.
Gabriolan on 28 Feb 2010 at 11:56 am #
Mike — a few people who have figured out my identity have done so because they know me in real life. They recognize my writing style, my photography style (such as it is), my collection of interests or something like that. Some of these people keep quiet about what they’ve concluded, while others can’t resist passing on a juicy tidbit. Then the infamous Gabriola Grapevine comes into play. Reuters can’t begin to compare with Gabriola when it comes to passing information around.
The person who posted information about me is somebody I’ve never met, so I’m assuming that the Gabriola Grapevine was the information source.
Having a few readers know my name isn’t that big a deal. It’s having people post details about me on the internet — that’s what I makes me think that blogging isn’t worthwhile for me anymore.
cheryl on 28 Feb 2010 at 4:03 pm #
Dear Gabriolan/and readers,
I get the feeling that MIKE just doesn’t get it! And I truly believe he never really will. So people, why don’t we just let this go and move on. If the person who posted Gabriolan’s info has repented (which I hope he/she has,) then let’s just hope the Gabriolan will continue the blog, and continue to teach and amuse us as he/she has in the past. What do you say Gabriolan will you continue?
Gabriolan on 28 Feb 2010 at 7:37 pm #
Cheryl — Mike and I might not agree about the privacy thing, but I have benefited from reading his opinion, and I thank him for sharing that.
Thank you for your support and encouragement. As for the blog’s future, see this.